
Most web pages don't survive long. IPFS solves the storage and addressing half of that problem, distributing files across a peer-to-peer network instead of one server, but it doesn't solve persistence on its own. Nodes periodically run garbage collection to free up space, and content nobody's actively keeping around can quietly get dropped. Pinning is the mechanism that prevents that, and a pinning service is what makes pinning practical without running your own IPFS infrastructure. Here's exactly how it works.
TL;DR:
IPFS nodes have limited storage capacity, and to manage that, they periodically run garbage collection, a process that clears out data to free up space. Content that nobody has explicitly told the node to keep is fair game to be removed during that process, including data other people might still be trying to reach. That's the specific gap pinning closes: pinning marks data to be retained through garbage collection instead of cleared, which is what actually makes "stored on IPFS" mean "stays reachable on IPFS."
A pinning service is a third-party provider that manages the pinning process for you. Rather than running your own IPFS node, keeping it online, and monitoring its storage, you upload content to the service and it handles pinning that content across infrastructure it maintains. In practice, that removes several real burdens:
One detail worth knowing before picking a provider: the IPFS Pinning Service API is a standardized specification, not something each vendor invents independently. Multiple providers implement the same spec, which means a pinning integration built against the standard API can, in principle, switch providers without a full rewrite. That portability is a genuine, underused advantage of sticking to standards-based tooling rather than a provider's proprietary API.
AIOZ Pin is a pinning service built on the AIOZ DePIN, a distributed network of independent nodes rather than one centralized provider's infrastructure. Concretely, that means:
pinFilesToIPFS(), pinFolderToIPFS(), pinByHash(), plus a standalone CLI tool) for pinning programmatically rather than through a dashboard aloneNot every claim of "reliable pinning" means the same thing in practice. A few questions worth asking before committing to a provider:
None of these are exotic requirements, but they're also not always obvious from a provider's marketing page, and they're exactly the kind of thing worth checking against actual documentation rather than assuming.
Why does IPFS content ever disappear if it's decentralized? Because a node's storage is finite. Garbage collection periodically clears content nobody has explicitly pinned, and if no other node is hosting a copy, that content becomes unreachable.
What does "pinning" actually do? It marks specific data to be retained through a node's garbage collection process, guaranteeing that node keeps a copy instead of clearing it to free up space.
Do I need to run my own IPFS node to use a pinning service? No. That's the specific problem a pinning service solves, it manages the pinning and hosting infrastructure so you don't have to run or maintain a node yourself.
What is the IPFS Pinning Service API? A standardized specification for pinning-service integrations. Because multiple providers implement the same API, switching providers doesn't necessarily require rewriting your integration from scratch.
How is AIOZ Pin's billing different from a typical cloud storage subscription? It's pay-as-you-go, funded by depositing AIOZ tokens into an account wallet, rather than a fixed monthly tier. Usage is deducted from that balance daily as storage and bandwidth actually accrue.
Can pinned content still be lost? The garbage-collection risk pinning solves is real, but no storage guarantee is absolute. Reviewing a provider's actual replication and persistence mechanics, not just the marketing claim, is worth doing before treating any single copy as permanent.

Free public IPFS gateways are being rate-limited on purpose, not as a bug. Here is exactly what IPFS's own blog says is changing, and what to actually do.

Two real, documented IPFS deployments, a media platform and a blockchain publisher, and the specific architectural problem each one solved with it.

Uploading a site to IPFS is the easy part. Here is the full picture: CID, gateway access, a real domain, and the pinning step most tutorials skip.

Cancelling a pinning service is not documented the way it should be, anywhere in the industry. Here is exactly what you can control before you stop paying.

IPFS node types aren't a full-vs-light weight class the way some blockchains work. They are specific jobs a node opts into. Here is what each one does.

IPFS content is immutable by design: change one byte and the CID changes with it. Here is exactly what happens when you edit a file, and why IPNS fixes it.